That’s the most frustrating part—when someone’s integrity is questioned just because they’re asking for what’s fair. It’s understandable why she’d feel that way, but there are a few reasons why she shouldn't take their attitude to heart:
1. She followed the rules
Dishonest people usually don’t show up five days later with a physical receipt. Scammers usually want a "fix" right then and there without proof, or they try to get cash back. By bringing the receipt and waiting until she was back in the area, Elyse acted like a completely honest customer.
2. The "Bad Apple" Tax
The staff was likely "projecting." In food service, they probably do deal with people trying to get free food daily. But a professional worker knows how to tell the difference. Treating your mom like a "scammer" just because they’re burnt out by other people is a sign of poor training and bad management, not a reflection of her.
3. Your Perspective
Think about your Poshmark closet. If a buyer reached out saying an item was damaged and offered to send photos or proof, you’d treat them with respect because they’re being transparent. You wouldn’t throw the package at them! The fact that she had the receipt and the name of the manager she spoke to is the "gold standard" of proof.
Why the "Calm Down" was likely a defense mechanism
When employees realize they have to do extra work (like a remake) or realize they might be wrong, they sometimes get defensive. By telling her to "calm down," they tried to flip the script to make her the one in the wrong so they didn't have to feel bad about their own poor service.
How is she doing now? If she's still feeling down about it, it might help to remind her that they are the ones who failed the "customer service test," not her.
Would it help if I helped you draft a quick, professional email she could send to the corporate office or the owner just to get it off her chest?
That explains exactly why she was frustrated! Waiting 20 minutes for a "replacement" that was already promised is a huge failure on their part.
When you add it all up, they put her through a total "customer service gauntlet":
* The Drive-Thru Rejection: They likely told her "we don't do that here" or "you have to come inside," which is just a way to clear their drive-thru timer. It forced her to park, unbuckle, and walk in—which is already an extra hurdle.
* The 20-Minute Wait: For a remake, she should have been a priority. Making her wait that long is a classic (and rude) tactic to make a customer feel like they are being punished for complaining.
* The Hostility: After making her wait 20 minutes, telling her to "calm down" when she likely asked why it was taking so long is just adding insult to injury.
Why her "dishonesty" fear is likely wrong:
If she were trying to "scam" them, she wouldn't have stood in the lobby for 20 minutes. Scammers want to get in and out quickly before they get caught. The fact that she was willing to wait proves she just wanted her order fixed.
The "Pizza Hut" Perspective
Think back to your time as a cook and waitress. If a customer came in with a receipt for a messed-up pizza from earlier in the week:
* You’d apologize for the original mistake.
* You’d put their order at the front of the line.
* You’d definitely not throw the pizza box at them.
The behavior she described—the drive-thru rejection, the long wait, and the aggressive bagging—suggests a staff that is poorly managed and probably very unhappy in their jobs. They took their frustration out on her.
Is she planning on going back there ever again? Honestly, after being treated like that and having food "thrown" in a bag, I wouldn't blame her if she blacklisted that location entirely. If she’s still upset, it might make her feel better to know that she did everything right—the restaurant is the one that failed.
No comments:
Post a Comment